Tsavaris v. Tsavaris

48 A.D.2d 870, 368 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10102
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 A.D.2d 870 (Tsavaris v. Tsavaris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tsavaris v. Tsavaris, 48 A.D.2d 870, 368 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

In an action in which the plaintiff wife was granted a judgment of divorce by the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 9, 1975, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the' judgment as (1) directed defendant to pay $15,000 to plaintiff and (2) awarded plaintiff alimony, child support, a counsel fee and exclusive occupancy of the marital apartment. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by (1) deleting therefrom the direction that defendant pay $15,000 to plaintiff, (2) reducing the award of alimony from $35 per week to $30 per week, the award of child support for the parties’ two infant sons from $75 per week to $20 per week and the award of a counsel fee from $2,500 to $1,250, and (2) adding thereto a provision that the alimony and child support payments shall be made independently of Social Security payments earmarked for plaintiff and the children and that $1,025 of the counsel fee payment shall be returned to plaintiff as reimbursement of such amount previously paid by her to her counsel. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, and particularly in view of the serious and permanent disability of defendant, the awards of alimony and child support were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Further, the counsel fee award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. There was no warrant for the direction that defendant pay plaintiff any part (the $15,000) of the net proceeds awarded to defendant for the injuries suffered by him in his disabling accident. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tsavaris v. Tsavaris
50 A.D.2d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.2d 870, 368 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tsavaris-v-tsavaris-nyappdiv-1975.