Trustees of the Teamsters Union No 142 Pension Fund v. CNB Construction LLC

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana
DecidedNovember 16, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-00213
StatusUnknown

This text of Trustees of the Teamsters Union No 142 Pension Fund v. CNB Construction LLC (Trustees of the Teamsters Union No 142 Pension Fund v. CNB Construction LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trustees of the Teamsters Union No 142 Pension Fund v. CNB Construction LLC, (N.D. Ind. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS ) UNION NO. 142 PENSION FUND, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) NO. 2:21 CV 213-PPS-JPK ) C.N.B. CONSTRUCTION LLC, ) ) Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs, Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund, Trustees of the Teamsters Union Local No. 142 Training and Apprenticeship Trust Fund, and Trustees of the Teamsters Union Local No. 142 Annuity Fund, filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant C.N.B. Construction LLC. [DE 7.] The request is supported by a memorandum [DE 8] as well as an affidavit of Jay Smith, Fund Manager of Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund, Training and Apprenticeship Trust Fund, and Annuity Fund [DE 8-1], and an affidavit of attorney’s fees [DE 8-8]. For the following reasons, I will grant Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment and grant the requested damages as against Defendant C.N.B. Construction LLC. Background

Plaintiffs are trustees of a multi-employer pension fund, training trust fund, and annuity fund. They filed this collection action against the Defendant/Employer, C.N.B. Construction LLC, pursuant to Section 502(a)(3), (e)(1), and (f) of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(3), (e)(1) and (f), and 1145 and Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (“LMRA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), seeking to obtain unpaid benefit fund contributions.

The collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) with Teamsters Union Local No. 142 (the “Union”) and the Restated Trust Agreement [DE 8-2, 8-3, 8-7] require C.N.B. to pay contributions on behalf of employees performing work under the CBAs. Despite those written agreements, C.N.B. has failed to pay the required contributions. Plaintiffs filed suit on July 3, 2021. [DE 1.] Summons was issued and returned

executed as to defendant C.N.B. [DE 3, 4.] C.N.B. has not appeared by counsel, or filed any answer or other responsive pleading. On August 9, 2021, Plaintiffs requested the Clerk enter default, and obtained entry of default that same day against C.N.B. [DE 5, 6.] Plaintiffs filed a motion for default judgment on October 12, 2021. [DE 7.] Defendant C.N.B. has not filed an appearance, answer to the complaint, or any response

to the motion for default judgment. Discussion

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) governs the entry of default and default judgment. When a defendant fails to answer a complaint or otherwise defend himself, the clerk can make an entry of default. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). “Entry of default must precede an entry of default judgment.” Wolf Lake Terminals, Inc. v. Mut. Marine Ins. Co., 433 F.Supp.2d 933, 941 (N.D. Ind. 2005). In this case, default has been entered against the defendant by the Clerk. Once the default has been established, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 authorizes a party to seek and a court to enter a default judgment. So long as the allegations are well-pled, a default judgment generally “establishe[s], as a matter of law,

that defendants [are] liable to plaintiff as to each cause of action alleged in the complaint.” Dundee Cement Co. v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Prods., Inc., 722 F.2d 1319, 1323 (7th Cir. 1983) (quotation omitted); see also e360 Insight v. The Spamhaus Project, 500 F.3d 594, 602 (7th Cir. 2007). When a party applies for default judgment under Rule 55(b)(2), I am required to

exercise sound judicial discretion in determining whether the judgment should be entered. Wolf Lake Terminals, 433 F.Supp.2d at 941. I must consider a number of factors when deciding a motion for default judgment, including “whether there is a material issue of fact, whether the default is largely technical, whether the plaintiffs were substantially prejudiced, and how harsh an effect a default judgment might have.” Wolf Lake Terminals, 433 F.Supp.2d at 941; see Wright & Miller 10A FEDERAL PRAC. & PROC. §

2683 (3d ed.). All well-pleaded facts are taken as true for purposes of liability. Black v. Lane, 22 F.3d 1395, 1399 (7th Cir. 1994); Cameron v. Myers, 569 F.Supp.2d 762, 764 (N.D. Ind. 2008). Thus if the complaint establishes the requisite elements of liability on a claim, a plaintiff is entitled to relief for that claim. See In re Catt, 368 F.3d 789, 793 (7th Cir. 2004).

Nevertheless, an entry of default judgment is only appropriate if the allegations, along with other evidence submitted, establish a cognizable claim for relief. Franko v.

3 All About Travel Inc., No. 2:09-CV-233 JVB, 2014 WL 2803987, at *1 (N.D. Ind. June 19, 2014) (“Default judgment is appropriate only if the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint are sufficient to establish a legal claim.”). “Once the default is established,

and thus liability, the plaintiff still must establish his entitlement to the relief he seeks.” In re Catt, 368 F.3d at 793. In other words, I still have to decide whether damages are appropriate, and in what amount. In turning to the factors to consider when deciding a motion for default judgment, I first note that there is no material issue of fact. C.N.B. is a party to two

CBAs with the Union. C.N.B. is a member of the Four County Highway Contractor’s Group, which is a signatory to a CBA with the Union. [DE 8-2.] The CBA required C.N.B. to make periodic contributions on behalf of employees performing work covered under the CBA. [DE 8-1, 8-2.] C.N.B. is also a member of the Northwest Indiana Contractors Association (“NWICA”), which entered into a CBA with the Union for the period of June 1, 2020, through May 31, 2023. [DE 8-1 at 2; DE 8-3.] The NWICA CBA, as

amended by the C.N.B. Construction LLC Non-Construction Addendum, requires C.N.B. to make periodic contributions on behalf of its employees of Plaintiffs’ Pension Fund, Training and Apprentice Fund and Annuity Fund in the amounts established by the CBA. [DE 8-1 at 2; DE 8-3, Article 14, Addendum.] The default in this case was not just largely technical. As outlined in the Smith

affidavit, C.N.B. routinely failed to pay contributions despite frequent demands from the fund’s collection office. [DE 8-1 at 2.] After this suit was filed on July 3, 2021, C.N.B.

4 made a partial payment, but additional amounts owed keep accruing each month. [Id.] The declarations prepared by Smith show that C.N.B. owes more than $150,000 in contributions alone, plus ancillary costs and fees, which is substantial prejudice to

Plaintiffs. [Id. at 3-4.] C.N.B. owes contribution on two accounts: 1523 and 1524. The Trust Agreement provides that if employers are delinquent in contributions, the Trustees may take any steps necessary to collect the funds, and C.N.B. shall pay interest on all money due, and all expenses of collection incurred by the Trustees, including costs and legal fees. [DE 8-

1 at 3-4; DE 9-7, Art.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus Project
500 F.3d 594 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
Cameron v. Myers
569 F. Supp. 2d 762 (N.D. Indiana, 2008)
Wolf Lake Terminals, Inc. v. Mutual Marine Insurance
433 F. Supp. 2d 933 (N.D. Indiana, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Trustees of the Teamsters Union No 142 Pension Fund v. CNB Construction LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trustees-of-the-teamsters-union-no-142-pension-fund-v-cnb-construction-llc-innd-2021.