Trustees of Columbia University v. Axenfeld

136 Misc. 831, 241 N.Y.S. 4, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1153
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1930·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Townley, J.

Motion for temporary injunction is granted. The conclusion is irresistible that defendants in adopting the name “ Columbia Educational Institute did so with the deliberate design of conveying to the public the impression that they were identical or associated with the plaintiff. The right of plaintiff to its name “ Columbia University ” was expressly conferred by the Legislature in 1784 and has been in constant use since that time. It has built up a great name and standing among the educational institutions of the country, which name cannot be appropriated by the device resorted to by the defendants. Bond $250. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trustees of Columbia University v. Axenfeld, 136 Misc. 831, 241 N.Y.S. 4, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1153 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1930).

136 Misc. 831 (Trustees of Columbia University v. Axenfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Explorers Club, Inc. v. Diageo plc
45 Misc. 3d 434 (New York Supreme Court, 2014)
California Western School of Law v. California Western University
125 Cal. App. 3d 1002 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
President of Colby College v. Colby Junior College for Women
359 F. Supp. 571 (D. New Hampshire, 1973)
Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.
14 Cal. App. 3d 289 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
22 A.D.2d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
44 Misc. 2d 808 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Cornell University v. Messing Bakeries, Inc.
285 A.D. 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)