Trussell v. Ripps

168 So. 2d 619, 277 Ala. 248
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 6, 1964·No. 1 Div. 222·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

HARWOOD, Justice.

The appellee has moved that this judgment be affirmed because no errors have-been assigned.

The suing out of an appeal is analogous, to the institution of a new suit. The assignment of errors correspond to the complaint or bill in the original proceedings. Snellings v. Jones, 33 Ala.App. 301, 33 So.2d 371. Without any assignment of error, an appeal can present nothing for review. This defect is jurisdictional.

Appellee’s motion, though superfluous, is due to be granted. Had no motion been filed, the judgment would of necessity stand affirmed. Tidwell v. Town of Town Creek, 264 Ala. 330, 87 So.2d 646; Patterson v. Gains, 264 Ala. 183, 85 So.2d 892; Erwin v. Erwin, 269 Ala. 632, 114 So.2d 918; Supreme Court Rule 1.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trussell v. Ripps, 168 So. 2d 619, 277 Ala. 248 (Ala. 1964).

168 So. 2d 619 (Trussell v. Ripps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mathis v. Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County
268 So. 2d 822 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
White v. White
233 So. 2d 510 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1970)
Williams v. Clark
232 So. 2d 660 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1970)
Watson v. City of Dothan
196 So. 2d 869 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1966)
Belcher v. City Commission of City of Birmingham
192 So. 2d 454 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1966)
Ex parte Russell
189 So. 2d 760 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1966)
Morris v. Morris
177 So. 2d 324 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)