Morris v. Morris

177 So. 2d 324, 278 Ala. 217, 1965 Ala. LEXIS 874
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 15, 1965·No. 4 Div. 225·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GOODWYN, Justice.

There being no assignments of error “bound with the transcript,” as required by . Rule 1 of the Revised Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. XIX, XX (Code 1940, Tit. 7, 1955 Cum.Pocket Part, p. 220; Recompiled Code 1958 (unofficial), Tit. 7, Appendix, p. 1154), we have no alternative but to affirm the decree appealed from. See: Trussell v. Ripps, 277 Ala. 248, 168 So.2d 619; Erwin v. Erwin, 269 Ala. 632, 114 So.2d 918; Patterson v. Gains, 264 Ala. 183, 85 So.2d 892; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J.j and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. Morris, 177 So. 2d 324, 278 Ala. 217, 1965 Ala. LEXIS 874 (Ala. 1965).

177 So. 2d 324 (Morris v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mathis v. Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County
268 So. 2d 822 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)