Trullinger v. Dooly & Co.
266 P. 909, 265 P. 1117, 125 Or. 269, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 142
This text of 266 P. 909 (Trullinger v. Dooly & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Trullinger v. Dooly & Co., 266 P. 909, 265 P. 1117, 125 Or. 269, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 142 (Or. 1928).
Opinions
The lower court sustained a motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants and plaintiff has appealed.
We have examined the pleadings and are satisfied that the decision of the lower court is correct. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Charles Bergstralh v. Gayle Lowe and City of Bend, Oregon
504 F.2d 1276 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Hryciuk v. Robinson
326 P.2d 424 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1958)
Trullinger v. Dooly & Co.
266 P. 909 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
266 P. 909, 265 P. 1117, 125 Or. 269, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trullinger-v-dooly-co-or-1928.