Trullinger v. Dooly & Co.
266 P. 909, 265 P. 1117, 125 Or. 269, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 142
Opinions
The lower court sustained a motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants and plaintiff has appealed.
We have examined the pleadings and are satisfied that the decision of the lower court is correct. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trullinger v. Dooly & Co., 266 P. 909, 265 P. 1117, 125 Or. 269, 1928 Ore. LEXIS 142 (Or. 1928).
266 P. 909 (Trullinger v. Dooly & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Charles Bergstralh v. Gayle Lowe and City of Bend, Oregon
504 F.2d 1276 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Hryciuk v. Robinson
326 P.2d 424 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1958)
Trullinger v. Dooly & Co.
266 P. 909 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)