Truelsch v. Miller

202 N.W. 352, 186 Wis. 239, 38 A.L.R. 914, 1925 Wisc. LEXIS 238
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 10, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by64 cases

This text of 202 N.W. 352 (Truelsch v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Truelsch v. Miller, 202 N.W. 352, 186 Wis. 239, 38 A.L.R. 914, 1925 Wisc. LEXIS 238 (Wis. 1925).

Opinion

The following opinion was filed January 13, 1925:

Jones, J.

The views of the referee and the trial judge as to the legal questions involved present a striking contrast. The trial court held that Paul was a mere employee and in no sense a trustee; that the letters and books of the company offered were mere hearsay; that the title to the policies became at once vested in the plaintiff under the statutes and could not be divested except by surrender and indorsement.

In treating the letters as pure hearsay the court disregarded an important exception to the rule excluding hearsay evidence which has long been recognized as well settled. In his work on Evidence Mr. Wigmore traces the history of the exception and shows that it had its origin more than a century ago. Secs. 1456, 1476. The exception is that the declarations of-persons, since deceased, are admissible in evidence provided the declarant had 'peculiar means of knowing the matter stated, if he had no interest to misrepresent it, and if it was opposed to his pecuniary or proprietary interest. Such declarations are not received as admissions, nor as entries made in the ordinary course of business,

[247]*247

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steinmann v. Steinmann
2008 WI 43 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2008)
Ross v. Specialty Risk Consultants, Inc.
2000 WI App 258 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2000)
Lackey v. Lackey
691 So. 2d 990 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1997)
Parge v. Parge
464 N.W.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1990)
State v. Anderson
416 N.W.2d 276 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Stewartson
443 So. 2d 1074 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Merkel
279 N.W.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1979)
Prince v. Bryant
275 N.W.2d 676 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1979)
Wilmington Trust Company v. Barry
338 A.2d 575 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1975)
Meyer v. Ludwig
222 N.W.2d 679 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1974)
State v. Sharlow
212 N.W.2d 591 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)
State v. Johnson
210 N.W.2d 735 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)
Richards v. Richards
206 N.W.2d 134 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)
Kain v. State
179 N.W.2d 777 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1970)
American Casualty Company v. M.S.L. Industries
406 F.2d 1219 (First Circuit, 1969)
American Casualty Co. v. M. S. L. Industries, Inc.
406 F.2d 1219 (Seventh Circuit, 1969)
Costell v. First National Bank of Mobile
150 So. 2d 683 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
First National Bank of Mobile v. Pope
149 So. 2d 781 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 N.W. 352, 186 Wis. 239, 38 A.L.R. 914, 1925 Wisc. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/truelsch-v-miller-wis-1925.