Trotman v. Warden of DOC NYC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVIDMIROIMAN, SS

Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 8455 (LTS) JUDGMENT WARDEN OF DOC NYC, ET AL., Defendants. wn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated April 22, 2025, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF 6-7) is denied. As set forth in the September 3, 2024 order, Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP is denied, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because Plaintiff has three strikes and the imminent danger exception does not apply. Judgment is entered dismissing this action without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York April 23, 2025

TAMMI M HELLWIG — Clerkof Court BY: MANGE Deputy Clerk