Trivedi v. General Electric Company

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 19, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-00126·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ Plaintiff, -against- 23 CIVIL 0126 (LTS) JUDGMENT GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL., Defendant. wn eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated November 12, 2024, The motion to "Withdraw mandate, motion to extend time to file petition for REHEARING EN BANC" is denied without prejudice as unnecessary, because the same motion is pending in the Second Circuit. Motion (ECF 18) terminated. No further documents will be accepted in this closed case with the exception of documents addressed to the Second Circuit. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York November 19, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court

BY: ER DeputyClerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trivedi v. General Electric Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Trivedi v. General Electric Company (Trivedi v. General Electric Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)