Triplett v. Bank of Washington

3 D.C. 646

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Triplett v. Bank of Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 F. Cas. 202 →

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1829·Published

Opinion

The Court refused to make the order; not being satisfied that the books contained any matter pertinent to the issue, (no particular letter being designated,) and not being of opinion that the plaintiff has a- right to inspect the books for the purpose of ascertaining whether they contained any such matter.

The cause was tried. Verdict for defendant. Exceptions taken to the rejection of evidence, but no important point of law decided by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The cause was tried. Verdict for defendant. Exceptions taken to the rejection of evidence, but no important point of law decided by the Court.

Triplett v. Bank of Washington, 3 D.C. 646 (circtddc 1829).

Pincite

3 D.C. 646 (Triplett v. Bank of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.