Triplett v. Bank of Washington

3 D.C. 646

This text of 3 D.C. 646 (Triplett v. Bank of Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Triplett v. Bank of Washington, 3 D.C. 646 (circtddc 1829).

Opinion

The Court refused to make the order; not being satisfied that the books contained any matter pertinent to the issue, (no particular letter being designated,) and not being of opinion that the plaintiff has a- right to inspect the books for the purpose of ascertaining whether they contained any such matter.

The cause was tried. Verdict for defendant. Exceptions taken to the rejection of evidence, but no important point of law decided by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 D.C. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/triplett-v-bank-of-washington-circtddc-1829.