Trio Distributor Corp. v. City of Albany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trio Distributor Corp. v. City of Albany

2 A.D.2d 715, 153 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5006

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 715 (Trio Distributor Corp. v. City of Albany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trio Distributor Corp. v. City of Albany, 2 A.D.2d 715, 153 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5006 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by the defendants-appellants to stay the operative effect of a temporary injunction or in the alternative for immediate argument [716]*716of the appeal. Motion denied. In view of the expedition with which the Special Term and the Trial Term have proceeded in this action, we see no occasion for interference by this court at this time. If the appeal from the temporary injunction has not been rendered academic by a decision on the merits by the adjourned date of this term, July 9, the appeal may be argued on that date. If the plaintiffs-respondents are not ready to proceed on that date, the application by the defendants-appellants to stay the operative effect of the temporary injunction may be renewed on that date on the papers now before us. Present — Bergan, J. P., Coon, Halpern, Zeller and Gibson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by the defendants-appellants to stay the operative effect of a temporary injunction or in the alternative for immediate argument [716]*716of the appeal. Motion denied. In view of the expedition with which the Special Term and the Trial Term have proceeded in this action, we see no occasion for interference by this court at this time. If the appeal from the temporary injunction has not been rendered academic by a decision on the merits by the adjourned date of this term, July 9, the appeal may be argued on that date. If the plaintiffs-respondents are not ready to proceed on that date, the application by the defendants-appellants to stay the operative effect of the temporary injunction may be renewed on that date on the papers now before us. Present — Bergan, J. P., Coon, Halpern, Zeller and Gibson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 715, 153 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trio-distributor-corp-v-city-of-albany-nyappdiv-1956.