People v. Klinge
This text of 12 N.E.2d 161 (People v. Klinge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgments should be reversed and the information dismissed upon the ground that chapter 23, article 13, section 153, subdivision 2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of New York referring to the fifth ward of Queens borough is unreasonable, arbitrary, oppressive and discriminatory. (Cf. People v. Cohen, 272 N. Y. 319; People v. Kuc, 272 N. Y. 72; Matter of Mid-State Advertising Corp. v. Bond, 274 N. Y. 82.)
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 N.E.2d 161, 276 N.Y. 292, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-klinge-ny-1938.