Trinkler v. Alabama
418 U.S. 917, 94 S. Ct. 3207, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1160, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2183
Opinions
Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hamling v. United States, ante, p. 87, and Jenkins v. Georgia, ante, p. 153. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state ban on obscenity is prohibited by the First Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certio-rari and reverse the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trinkler v. Alabama, 418 U.S. 917, 94 S. Ct. 3207, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1160, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2183 (1974).
418 U.S. 917 (Trinkler v. Alabama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oregon State Penitentiary v. Jerry Hammer
434 U.S. 945 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Trinkler v. State
302 So. 2d 125 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Trinkler v. Alabama
418 U.S. 917 (Supreme Court, 1974)