Trinkler v. Alabama

Supreme Court

Trinkler v. Alabama

418 U.S. 917, 94 S. Ct. 3207, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1160, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2183

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJuly 25, 1974

Docket73-844

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 418 U.S. 917 (Trinkler v. Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trinkler v. Alabama, 418 U.S. 917, 94 S. Ct. 3207, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1160, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2183 (1974).

Pincite

Opinions

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hamling v. United States, ante, p. 87, and Jenkins v. Georgia, ante, p. 153. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state ban on obscenity is prohibited by the First Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certio-rari and reverse the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hamling v. United States, ante, p. 87, and Jenkins v. Georgia, ante, p. 153. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state ban on obscenity is prohibited by the First Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certio-rari and reverse the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

418 U.S. 917, 94 S. Ct. 3207, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1160, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trinkler-v-alabama-scotus-1974.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack