Trimble v. Town of Haleyville
This text of 101 So. 524 (Trimble v. Town of Haleyville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Rehearing.
The trial was de novo in the/ circuit court. Wright v City of Bessemer,’ 209 Ala. 374, 96 So. 316. The certiorari is ruled by Thomas v. City of Mobile, 203 Ala. 96, 82 So. 110.' The latter authority from this court differentiates, or is at variance with, the construction given the statute and general ordinances in question (Code 1907, § 1217) in Goldberger v. City of Mobile, 17 Ala. App. 145, 82 So. 635; Jackson v. City of Mobile, 16 Ala. App. 664, 81 So. 184; Hannibal v. City of Mobile, 16 Ala. App. 625, 80 So. 629; Clark v. City of Uniontown, 4 Ala. App. 264, 58 So. 725. The foregoing authorities by the Court of Appeals appear not to have been approved by this court.
The cases of Eeagin v. City of Andalusisl, 12 Ala. App. 611, 67 So. 630, and Cooper v. City of Gadsden, 10 Ala. App. 609, 65 So. 715, bear analogy to the decision in Thomas v. Oity of Mobile, 203 Ala. 96, 82 So. 110.
The writ was properly denied, and the application for rehearing is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 So. 524, 211 Ala. 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trimble-v-town-of-haleyville-ala-1924.