Jackson v. City of Mobile

81 So. 184, 16 Ala. App. 664, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 16
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 21, 1919
Docket1 Div. 300.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 81 So. 184 (Jackson v. City of Mobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. City of Mobile, 81 So. 184, 16 Ala. App. 664, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 16 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

BROWN, P. J.

This is a prosecution for violation of a municipal ordinance, and originated in the recorder’s court of the city of Mobile. From the judgment of the recorder, an appeal was prosecuted to the circuit court, where the defendant was accorded a trial by jury. The verdict of the jury assessed the defendant's fine at $75, and, upon failure to pay the fine and costs, he was sentenced to hard labor for the city to pay the fine and costs. The court, as additional pun-., Ishment, sentenced him to six months’ hard labor, and in this committed error. Hannibal v. City of Mobile, ante, p. 625, 80 So. 629; Clark v. City of Uniontown, 4 Ala. App. 264, 58 South. 725.

There being no error in the judgment of conviction, that judgment will be affirmed; but the sentence is set aside and annulled and the cause remanded to the trial court for proper sentence In accordance with the law.

Affirmed in part, and in part reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. City of Jasper
43 So. 2d 843 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1950)
Ex Parte Trimble
101 So. 524 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Trimble v. Town of Haleyville
101 So. 524 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Goldberger v. City of Mobile
82 So. 635 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 So. 184, 16 Ala. App. 664, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-city-of-mobile-alactapp-1919.