Triffin v. Interstate Funding Co.

571 A.2d 1053, 391 Pa. Super. 551, 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 72
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 22, 1990
DocketNo. 02441
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 571 A.2d 1053 (Triffin v. Interstate Funding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Triffin v. Interstate Funding Co., 571 A.2d 1053, 391 Pa. Super. 551, 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 72 (Pa. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

KELLY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition to open judgment. We remand for further proceedings in the trial court.

On October 19, 1988, an order was entered which denied the petition of Girard Bank (rechartered as Mellon Bank (East) N.A. “Mellon”) to open judgment. This timely appeal was taken from that order.

After thirty days had passed, and without an order vacating the October 19, 1988 order being granted to permit reconsideration, jurisdiction over this issue passed from the trial court and was lodged in this Court. See Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.C. v. Pennsylvania Nation[553]*553al Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, 521 Pa. 462, 555 A.2d 1284 (1989); Luckenbaugh v. Shearer, 362 Pa.Super. 9, 523 A.2d 399 (1987) (en banc); see also Pa.R.A.P. 903 and 1701.

Nonetheless, on June 13, 1989, an order was entered by the trial court which purported to strike the judgment against Mellon, and which directed that the case be listed for trial. Appellee, Robert J. Triffin, t/a General Funding (“Triffin”), filed timely notice of appeal from that “order.” However, that appeal was withdrawn in August, 1989.1

Under the relevant rules of procedure, the June 13, 1989 order was a nullity. The trial court was without jurisdiction to reconsider its October 19, 1988 order at that late date, while the appeal of that order was pending in this Court. See Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.C. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, supra; Luckenbaugh v. Shearer, supra.2

Though we can give no effect to the June 13, 1989 order, we deem it appropriate to remand this case to the trial court for reconsideration of the October 19, 1988 order, in light of the trial court’s apparent change of position on the motion. Cf. MNC Corp. v. Mt. Lebanon Medical Center, Inc., 294 Pa.Super. 405, 440 A.2d 528 (1982); accord Commonwealth v. McMillan, 376 Pa.Super. 25, 35 n. 3, 545 A.2d 301, 306 n. 3 (1988); Commonwealth v. Gore, 327 Pa.Super. 294, 475 A.2d 804 (1984). In MNC Corp. v. Mt. Lebanon Medical Center, Inc., supra, the trial court, recognizing that jurisdiction over its order denying a petition to open judgment has passed to this Court, confessed [554]*554error in its Pa.R.A.P.1925 opinion. We exercised our discretion and remanded to permit reconsideration.

The situation here is similar but concedely more complicated and less clear. In this case, a judge of the same court has entered an invalid order which purported to strike judgment and list the case for trial, despite the prior order of a different judge of the same court denying the motion to strike judgment. The original order denying the motion to strike is supported by an opinion which concluded that a “fatal defect in the record” warranting the striking of the judgment was not established. No opinion in support of the invalid June 13, 1989 order is included in the record here on appeal. The situation here is plainly more complicated and less clear than the trial court’s simple confession of error in MNC Corp.; however, we nonetheless conclude that the apparent conflict in the trial court as to the proper disposition of the motion to strike judgment should be considered and resolved in the trial court prior to consideration of the issue by this Court. We note that it is for the trial court, initially, to resolve any “law of the case” implications of its reconsideration of the October 19, 1988 order. Cf. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 377 Pa.Super. 72, 546 A.2d 1168 (1988).

Case remanded to permit reconsideration of the October 19, 1988 order. The June 13, 1989 order shall be deemed a nullity.

Jurisdiction is relinquished. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Storlazzi
729 A.2d 1206 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
Mitchell v. Moore
729 A.2d 1200 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
Henninger v. State Farm Insurance
719 A.2d 1074 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 A.2d 1053, 391 Pa. Super. 551, 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/triffin-v-interstate-funding-co-pasuperct-1990.