Triangle Excavating Company, Inc. v. Covert Township

713 N.W.2d 767, 475 Mich. 855, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 968
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 2006·No. 130422·Published

Opinion

713 N.W.2d 767 (2006)
475 Mich. 855

TRIANGLE EXCAVATING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COVERT TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130422. COA No. 255507.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 17, 2006.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the Court of Appeals judgment affirming the Van Buren Circuit Court's grant of summary disposition to defendant. Plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to raise a material issue of fact whether defendant intentionally and voluntarily relinquished its right to enforce the contractual requirement of written notification of unforeseen site conditions. A.J. Smith Constr. Co. v. Marine City, 267 Mich. 367, 255 N.W. 209 (1934). We REMAND this case to the Van Buren Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Triangle Excavating Company, Inc. v. Covert Township, 713 N.W.2d 767, 475 Mich. 855, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 968 (Mich. 2006).

713 N.W.2d 767 (Triangle Excavating Company, Inc. v. Covert Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A. J. Smith Construction Co. v. City of Marine City
255 N.W. 209 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)