Trevino v. State

254 S.W.2d 788, 158 Tex. Crim. 252, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1399
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 3, 1952
Docket26065
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 254 S.W.2d 788 (Trevino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trevino v. State, 254 S.W.2d 788, 158 Tex. Crim. 252, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1399 (Tex. 1952).

Opinions

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment is assessed ¿t confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

This is a companion case to No. 26,068, Trevino v. State, (Page 255, this volume) this day decided. The present cause relates to the burglary of a church at Poth, Texas, in Wilson County. The testimony in the two cases is largely the same. However, in the instant case, appellant stated in his written confession that he entered the church at Poth for the purpose of taking money out of a vigilite box which was located in said church, but when he reached this box he found that it had been previously burglarized by someone else. According to his confession, appellant entered the church for the purpose of theft, and not finding any funds in the vigilite box in the church at [253]*253Poth, Texas, he immediately burglarized the church at Falls City, Texas, as shown in Cause No. 26,068, Trevino v. State.

It is worthy of note that the testimony of the priest in in charge of the church at Poth evidences the fact that there were funds in the amount of about $3.10 in the vigilite box some short time prior to the time that appellant entered the church.

Under the reasoning set forth in the companion case, No. 26,068, we hold that this church at Poth was a subject of burglary, and that the appellant’s guilt being evident and no error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Breed, Steven Eric
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Steven Breed v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Eppinger v. State
800 S.W.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Johns v. Commonwealth
392 S.E.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1990)
Faggett v. State
673 S.W.2d 700 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Thommen v. State
505 S.W.2d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Mendoza v. State
442 S.W.2d 690 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Mauldin v. State
377 S.W.2d 199 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Trevino v. State
254 S.W.2d 788 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 S.W.2d 788, 158 Tex. Crim. 252, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trevino-v-state-texcrimapp-1952.