Trest v. Cain

Fifth Circuit

Trest v. Cain

141 F.3d 564, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9715, 1998 WL 241889

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1998

Docket94-40515

StatusPublished

This text of 141 F.3d 564 (Trest v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trest v. Cain, 141 F.3d 564, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9715, 1998 WL 241889 (5th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

This court, having considered the post-remand briefs filed by counsel for both parties, concludes that justice would best be served by remanding this case to the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED, that the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Trest v. Cain, Warden, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 478, 139 L.Ed.2d 444 (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

This court, having considered the post-remand briefs filed by counsel for both parties, concludes that justice would best be served by remanding this case to the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED, that the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Trest v. Cain, Warden, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 478, 139 L.Ed.2d 444 (1997).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 F.3d 564, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9715, 1998 WL 241889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trest-v-cain-ca5-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack