Trest v. Cain
This text of Trest v. Cain (Trest v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________ No. 99-31013 Summary Calendar _____________________
RICHARD F. TREST, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary,
Respondent-Appellee. _______________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (USDC No. 91-CV-2131) _______________________________________________________ June 29, 2000 Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing from the judgment against him, Richard Trest contends that the district court improperly denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm. The magistrate judge fully considered Trest’s contention and explained why Trest
was fully informed of his rights by the Mississippi court. And under the prior holdings of this court in this case the procedural bar may be and was invoked to deny the writ. Trest
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. v. Whitley, 94 F.3d 1005 (5th Cir. 1996), Magouirk v. Phillips, 144 F.3d 348 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trest v. Cain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trest-v-cain-ca5-2000.