Treib v. County of Dutchess

56 A.D.2d 866, 392 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11228
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1977·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a wrongful death action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated September 10, 1976, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In a wrongful death action against a county based upon improper highway maintenance, the Statute of Limitations is governed by section\139 of the Highway Law, not by section 50-i of the General Municipal Law. Thus, the time begins to run from the service of the notice of claim, not from the time of the accident (see Forero v Town of Tuxedo, 51 AD2d 443). Hopkins, Acting P. J., and Damiani, JJ., concur; Latham and Rabin, JJ., concur in the result on constraint of Forero v Town of Tuxedo (51 AD2d 443).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treib v. County of Dutchess, 56 A.D.2d 866, 392 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

56 A.D.2d 866 (Treib v. County of Dutchess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mingone v. State
100 A.D.2d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Collins v. City of New York
77 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)