Collins v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Collins v. City of New York

77 A.D.2d 643, 431 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12370

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 28, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 77 A.D.2d 643 (Collins v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. City of New York, 77 A.D.2d 643, 431 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In awrongful death action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 9, 1979, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff failed to commence her action within the time limitations set forth in section 50-i of the General Municipal Law (see Doyle v 800, Inc., 72 AD2d 761; Mikulka v New York City Tr. Auth., 56 AD2d 595; cf. Treib v County of Dutchess, 56 AD2d 866, app dsmd 42 NY2d 824; Forero v Town of Tuxedo, 51 AD2d 443; Erickson v Town of Henderson, 30 AD2d 282; contra Priebe v City of Canandaigua, 91 Mise 2d 1047). Accordingly, we affirm the order appealed from. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In awrongful death action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 9, 1979, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff failed to commence her action within the time limitations set forth in section 50-i of the General Municipal Law (see Doyle v 800, Inc., 72 AD2d 761; Mikulka v New York City Tr. Auth., 56 AD2d 595; cf. Treib v County of Dutchess, 56 AD2d 866, app dsmd 42 NY2d 824; Forero v Town of Tuxedo, 51 AD2d 443; Erickson v Town of Henderson, 30 AD2d 282; contra Priebe v City of Canandaigua, 91 Mise 2d 1047). Accordingly, we affirm the order appealed from. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 643, 431 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack