Treadway v. Diez
715 S.E.2d 852, 365 N.C. 289, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 815
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Treadway v. Diez, 715 S.E.2d 852, 365 N.C. 289, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 815 (N.C. 2011).
715 S.E.2d 852 (Treadway v. Diez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
795 S.E.2d 647 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)