Treadway v. Diez

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Treadway v. Diez

715 S.E.2d 851, 365 N.C. 288, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 810

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 7, 2011·No. 52A11·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Treadway v. Diez, 715 S.E.2d 851, 365 N.C. 288, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 810 (N.C. 2011).

Pincite

715 S.E.2d 851 (Treadway v. Diez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related