Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman

738 So. 2d 1028, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11160, 1999 WL 629865
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 20, 1999
DocketNo. 99-1672
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 738 So. 2d 1028 (Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman, 738 So. 2d 1028, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11160, 1999 WL 629865 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because this is an appeal from an order which denied a motion to dismiss for failure to timely serve a defendant, it is not an appealable, non-final order. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. See Thomas v. Silvers, 701 So.2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review granted, No. 91,860, — So.2d(Fla. Mar. 31, 1998); Khandjian v. Compagnie Financiere Mediterranee Cofimed, S.A., 619 So.2d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Similar to the Third District in Thomas v. Silvers, we certify conflict with Mid-Florida Associates, Ltd. v. Taylor, 641 So.2d 182 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), and Comisky v. Rosen Management Service, Inc., 630 So.2d 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (en banc).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, C.J., ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman
758 So. 2d 91 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 So. 2d 1028, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11160, 1999 WL 629865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traylor-bros-inc-v-shipman-fladistctapp-1999.