Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman

Supreme Court of Florida

Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman

758 So. 2d 91, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 269, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 714, 2000 WL 351394

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 6, 2000

DocketNo. SC96540

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 758 So. 2d 91 (Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Traylor Bros., Inc. v. Shipman, 758 So. 2d 91, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 269, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 714, 2000 WL 351394 (Fla. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Traylor Brothers, Inc., v. Shipman, 738 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), which certified conflict with Comisky v. Rosen Management Service, Inc., 630 So.2d 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), and Mid-Florida Associates, Ltd. v. Taylor, 641 So .2d 182 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), concerning the issue of a motion to dismiss alleging untimely service under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.707(j). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. In Thomas v. Silvers, 748 So.2d 263 (Fla.1999), we resolved this conflict by approving the decision of the district court below and holding that an order denying a motion to dismiss that is based on untimely service under rule 1.070(j) is not an order which determines “jurisdiction of the person” and therefore is not directly appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i). Therefore, we approve the First District’s decision in Traylor Brothers, based on our decision in Thomas.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Traylor Brothers, Inc., v. Shipman, 738 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), which certified conflict with Comisky v. Rosen Management Service, Inc., 630 So.2d 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), and Mid-Florida Associates, Ltd. v. Taylor, 641 So .2d 182 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), concerning the issue of a motion to dismiss alleging untimely service under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.707(j). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. In Thomas v. Silvers, 748 So.2d 263 (Fla.1999), we resolved this conflict by approving the decision of the district court below and holding that an order denying a motion to dismiss that is based on untimely service under rule 1.070(j) is not an order which determines “jurisdiction of the person” and therefore is not directly appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i). Therefore, we approve the First District’s decision in Traylor Brothers, based on our decision in Thomas.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 So. 2d 91, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 269, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 714, 2000 WL 351394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/traylor-bros-inc-v-shipman-fla-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack