Trawick v. State
115 So. 79, 217 Ala. 149, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 395
Opinion
The opinion of the Court of Appeals states that—
“The evidence in this record has been examined, and we find sufficient facts to authorize a jury in finding the defendant guilty as charged. We further are of the opinion that there is no reversible error in any of the rulings of the court.”
Under the uniform decisions of this court, these findings, without more, preclude a review of the Court of Appeals by certiorari. Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902; Ex parte Steverson, 211 Ala. 597, 100 So. 912; Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trawick v. State, 115 So. 79, 217 Ala. 149, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 395 (Ala. 1928).
115 So. 79 (Trawick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Birmingham v. Lynch
197 So. 48 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1940)
Milazzo v. State
189 So. 907 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
Houston v. State
148 So. 863 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Smith v. State
148 So. 860 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Hale v. Southern Ry. Co.
142 So. 589 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Ex Parte Hale
142 So. 589 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Powell v. State
141 So. 260 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Williams v. State
125 So. 207 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Skipper v. State
124 So. 118 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)