Campbell v. State

112 So. 902, 216 Ala. 295, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 87
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 21, 1927
Docket6 Div. 917.
StatusPublished
Cited by34 cases

This text of 112 So. 902 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. State, 112 So. 902, 216 Ala. 295, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 87 (Ala. 1927).

Opinions

PER CURIAM. Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

On Rehearing.
The Court of Appeals in disposing of the petitioner's case applied the doctrine of error without injury to the matter now complained of, without stating the facts in the opinion on which the conclusion of error without injury was predicated.

The settled rule here is that we will not, on application for the writ of certiorari, review that court on such question unless the statement of the facts in the opinion is such as authorizes a review. This court will not look to the record in the case to determine whether or not the doctrine has been improperly applied, as this would necessitate a review of the Court of Appeals on the facts or the application of the law to the facts. Ex parte Steverson, 211 Ala. 597, 100 So. 912; Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420,71 So. 91; Kirkwood v. State, 184 Ala. 9, 63 So. 990; Ex parte Western Union Tel. Co., 183 Ala. 451, 63 So. 88.

Application overruled.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., concur. *Page 296

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. City of Huntsville
259 So. 2d 288 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Johnson v. State
253 So. 2d 344 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)
Bryson v. State
84 So. 2d 785 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Fortenberry v. State
48 So. 2d 264 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)
McCutcheon v. State
48 So. 2d 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)
Flournoy v. State
37 So. 2d 223 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Birmingham Electric Co. v. Echols
32 So. 2d 379 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Brown v. State
31 So. 2d 684 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Harris v. State
23 So. 2d 514 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)
Turner v. State
191 So. 396 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
Tortomasi v. State
189 So. 905 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
Rutland v. City of Florence
181 So. 799 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Grant v. State
180 So. 333 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Tennessee, A. & G. Ry. v. Cardon
177 So. 173 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Cable-Burton Piano Co. v. Thomas
152 So. 468 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Armstrong v. Blackwood
151 So. 602 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Collier
154 So. 118 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Ex Parte Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York
149 So. 875 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Bishop v. State
145 So. 499 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Terry v. State
148 So. 159 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 So. 902, 216 Ala. 295, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-ala-1927.