Campbell v. State
This text of 112 So. 902 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
PER CURIAM. Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., concur.
The settled rule here is that we will not, on application for the writ of certiorari, review that court on such question unless the statement of the facts in the opinion is such as authorizes a review. This court will not look to the record in the case to determine whether or not the doctrine has been improperly applied, as this would necessitate a review of the Court of Appeals on the facts or the application of the law to the facts. Ex parte Steverson,
Application overruled.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., concur. *Page 296
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 So. 902, 216 Ala. 295, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-ala-1927.