Travis R. Stucky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Travis R. Stucky v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 20, 2018

Docket5D18-580

StatusPublished

This text of Travis R. Stucky v. State (Travis R. Stucky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Travis R. Stucky v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TRAVIS RAY STUCKY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-580

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 24, 2018

3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Robin C. Lemonidis, Judge.

Travis Ray Stucky, Bushnell, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 motion

for DNA testing because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We

agree and affirm without prejudice. Appellant may refile a facially sufficient motion if he

can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State, 147 So. 3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014);

Luckner v. State, 979 So. 2d 1121, 1121–22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI