LUCKNER v. State

979 So. 2d 1121, 2008 WL 1065784
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 2008·No. 3D08-440·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

979 So.2d 1121 (2008)

Joseph LUCKNER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D08-440.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 9, 2008.

Joseph Luckner, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and COPE and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion for DNA testing under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. The trial court erred, in part, by denying the motion for lack of an oath because the motion is, in fact, sworn. We agree with the trial court, however, that the motion is facially insufficient regarding Rule 3.853(b)(3) and (4). Appellant may replead *1122 in the trial court if he has a good-faith basis to do so.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LUCKNER v. State, 979 So. 2d 1121, 2008 WL 1065784 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

979 So. 2d 1121 (LUCKNER v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stucky v. State
251 So. 3d 356 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Travis R. Stucky v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018