Travel Guard Group, Inc. v. Grubb

795 So. 2d 170, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12472, 2001 WL 1008144
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2001·No. No. 3D01-686·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in denying temporary injunctive relief for the enforcement of the terms of a non-competitive agreement. See Uro-Care, P.A. v. Montford, M.D., 775 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc., 687 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Lurton v. Muldon Motor Co., 523 So.2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); see also Kupscznk v. Blasters, Inc., 647 So.2d 888, 891 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), review denied, 658 So.2d 991 (Fla.1995); Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Travel Guard Group, Inc. v. Grubb, 795 So. 2d 170, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12472, 2001 WL 1008144 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

795 So. 2d 170 (Travel Guard Group, Inc. v. Grubb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lurton v. Muldon Motor Co.
523 So. 2d 706 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Kupscznk v. Blasters, Inc.
647 So. 2d 888 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc.
687 So. 2d 329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin
482 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Uro-Care, P.A. v. Montford
775 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)