Transcom, Inc. v. United States

2001 CIT 44
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Transcom, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 F. Supp. 2d 1372
United States Court of International Trade·Decided April 17, 2001·No. 97-02-00249·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 01-44

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS __________________________________________ : TRANSCOM, INC., : : Plaintiff, : : L & S BEARING COMPANY, : : Plaintiff-Intervenor, : : v. : Court No. 97-02-00249 : THE UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : THE TIMKEN COMPANY, : : Defendant-Intervenor. : __________________________________________:

JUDGMENT

This Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Transcom Inc., L & S Bearing Company v. United States, 24 CIT ___, 123 F. Supp. 2d 1372 (2000) (“Remand Results”), and Commerce having complied with the Court’s remand and no responses to the Remand Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on February 23, 2001, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.

__________________________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge

Dated: April 17, 2001 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Transcom, Inc. v. United States, 2001 CIT 44 (cit 2001).

2001 CIT 44 (Transcom, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Transcom, Inc. v. United States
123 F. Supp. 2d 1372 (Court of International Trade, 2000)