Transcom Inc. v. United States
This text of 1999 CIT 86 (Transcom Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 99-86
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS ___________________________________ : TRANSCOM, INC., : : Plaintiff, : : L & S BEARING COMPANY, : : Plaintiff-Intervenor, : : v. : Court No. 97-01-00037 : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : THE TIMKEN COMPANY, : : Defendant-Intervenor. : ___________________________________:
O R D E R
In accordance with the decision (June 16, 1999) and mandate
(Aug. 9, 1999) of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, Appeal No. 98-1401, it is hereby
ORDERED that the judgment and order of this Court in Transcom,
Inc. v. United States, 22 CIT __, 5 F. Supp. 2d 984 (1998), is
vacated; and it is further
ORDERED that this case is remanded to the United States
Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Court No. 97-01-00037 Page 2
(“Commerce”), to refund to Transcom, Inc. antidumping duty deposits
made in excess of the 2.96% “all others” rate established in the
initial investigation on tapered roller bearings (“TRBs”) that it
obtained from unnamed exporters of TRBs from the People’s Republic
of China during the fourth, fifth and sixth administrative reviews
of the antidumping duty order.
______________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE
Dated: August 20, 1999 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1999 CIT 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/transcom-inc-v-united-states-cit-1999.