Trampusch v. Kastner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trampusch v. Kastner

242 A.D. 803

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 242 A.D. 803 (Trampusch v. Kastner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trampusch v. Kastner, 242 A.D. 803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment as to the appellant Kastner unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Judgment against Markovits Bros, reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to said appellants to abide the event. The written report by defendant Kastner to the Motor Vehicle Bureau (Defendant Kastner’s Exhibit D) was a self-serving declaration and was erroneously received in evidence, and was prejudicial to defendants Markovits. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment as to the appellant Kastner unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Judgment against Markovits Bros, reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to said appellants to abide the event. The written report by defendant Kastner to the Motor Vehicle Bureau (Defendant Kastner’s Exhibit D) was a self-serving declaration and was erroneously received in evidence, and was prejudicial to defendants Markovits. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trampusch-v-kastner-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack