Anderson v. Permanent Land No. 7 Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Anderson v. Permanent Land No. 7 Corp.

18 Misc. 2d 240, 192 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3463

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Misc. 2d 240 (Anderson v. Permanent Land No. 7 Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Permanent Land No. 7 Corp., 18 Misc. 2d 240, 192 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The portion of plaintiff’s report to the Workmen’s Compensation Board in which he described the alleged negligent condition was self-serving, and its admission in evidence erroneous and prejudicial to the defendants. (Bloom v. Union Ry. Co., 165 App. Div. 257; Trampusch v. Kastner, 242 App. Div. 803; Clark v. Thompson, 258 App. Div. 748; Bernstein v. Repatsky, 2 Misc 2d 938; Robb v. Hackley, 23 Wend. 50.)

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the defendants (o abide the event.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI