Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

415 F.2d 1007, 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2576, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10469
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 F.2d 1006
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 10, 1969·No. 25470_1·Published

Opinion

415 F.2d 1007

TRAILMOBILE DIVISION, PULLMAN INCORPORATED, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 25470.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

October 10, 1969.

Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas case).

Charles M. Lanier, New Orleans, La., Hulse Hays, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, Alan E. Harazin, Cincinnati, Ohio, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, for respondent.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of this cause en banc the Court concludes that the opinion and judgment of the majority of the panel be and the same is hereby affirmed, 5 Cir., 407 F.2d 1006.

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, BELL, AINSWORTH, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, 415 F.2d 1007, 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2576, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10469 (5th Cir. 1969).

415 F.2d 1007 (Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related