Tradewinds Airlines Inc. v. Soros

637 F. App'x 53
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 10, 2016·No. Nos. 15-1381-CV, 15-1366-CV·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from the District Court’s March 31, 2015 grant of summary judgment to defendants-appel-lees. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

“This Court reviews a grant of summary judgment by the district court de novo.” Lamence + Mem’l Hosp. v. Burwell, 812 F.3d 257, 264 (2d Cir.2016). Upon de novo review of the record and relevant law, we affirm, substantially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its thorough March 31, 2015 opinion and order. See TradeWinds Airlines, Inc. v. Soros, 101 F.Supp.3d 270 (S.D.N.Y.2015).

CONCLUSION

We have considered all of plaintiffs-ap•pellants’ arguments on appeal and found them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Court’s March 31,2015 judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tradewinds Airlines Inc. v. Soros, 637 F. App'x 53 (2d Cir. 2016).

637 F. App'x 53 (Tradewinds Airlines Inc. v. Soros) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin Hilti Family Trust v. Knoedler Gallery, LLC
386 F. Supp. 3d 319 (S.D. Illinois, 2019)