Tracy Shuler v. Geraldine Akpan (In Her Capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Georgianna Parker)

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 2022
DocketA23I0104
StatusPublished

This text of Tracy Shuler v. Geraldine Akpan (In Her Capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Georgianna Parker) (Tracy Shuler v. Geraldine Akpan (In Her Capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Georgianna Parker)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tracy Shuler v. Geraldine Akpan (In Her Capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Georgianna Parker), (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 12, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23I0104. TRACY SHULER v. GERALDINE AKPAN (IN HER CAPACITY AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGIANNA PARKER).

Tracy Shuler filed this application for interlocutory appeal, seeking review of the superior court’s order denying her motion to dismiss. The order was entered on November 10, 2022, and the certificate of immediate review was entered on November 22, 2022. We lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only if the trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review should be had. A timely certificate of immediate review is a jurisdictional requirement. See Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc., 133 Ga. App. 23, 24 (2) (209 SE2d 715) (1974). If the certificate of immediate review is not filed or entered within the prescribed ten-day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until the final judgment to appeal. See Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200 SE2d 748) (1973). Here, the certificate of immediate review was entered 12 days after entry of the order denying the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application for interlocutory appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/12/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. Harper
200 S.E.2d 748 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc.
209 S.E.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tracy Shuler v. Geraldine Akpan (In Her Capacity as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Georgianna Parker), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tracy-shuler-v-geraldine-akpan-in-her-capacity-as-the-personal-gactapp-2022.