Trace McCune v. Ashton Mitchell Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 3, 2026
DocketA26D0295
StatusPublished

This text of Trace McCune v. Ashton Mitchell Johnson (Trace McCune v. Ashton Mitchell Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trace McCune v. Ashton Mitchell Johnson, (Ga. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 03, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26D0295. TRACIE MCCUNE v. ASHTON MITCHELL JOHNSON.

This case was initiated when Ashton Mitchell Johnson filed a petition seeking to adopt his minor stepchild. See OCGA § 19-8-6. The child’s biological and putative father, Trace McCune, objected and moved to dismiss the petition. The trial court entered an order dismissing McCune’s motion and terminating his parental rights.1 McCune filed a motion for new trial from the termination order, which the trial court denied. McCune has filed the instant discretionary application from the orders terminating his parental rights and denying his motion for new trial.2 We lack jurisdiction. Ordinarily, a party seeking to appeal an order terminating parental rights must file an application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(12). But this is not a termination of parental rights case; it is an adoption case. It appears that no final order has been entered on the adoption petition. See OCGA § 5-6-34(a)(1)(B) (providing for a direct appeal from a “final judgment[ ], that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below”). Because the adoption case remains pending

1 See OCGA § 19-8-12(f) (providing for the termination of a biological father’s parental rights pursuant to an adoption petition). 2 Given the basis of our resolution of this case, we need not address the issue of whether McCune’s application was timely to the termination of his parental rights and we make no determination as to whether McCune’s motion for new trial in this context was appropriate. below, McCune was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34(b) in order to appeal. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dep’t of Human Res., 261 Ga. 587, 588-589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991); Park v. Bailey, 329 Ga. App. 569, 571 (765 SE2d 721) (2014); Gray v. Springs, 224 Ga. App. 427, 427 (481 SE2d 3) (1997). Because he has not done so, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/03/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Scruggs v. Georgia Department of Human Resources
408 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
Gray v. Springs
481 S.E.2d 3 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Park v. Bailey
765 S.E.2d 721 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Trace McCune v. Ashton Mitchell Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trace-mccune-v-ashton-mitchell-johnson-gactapp-2026.