Towner v. State

594 So. 2d 351, 1992 WL 41467
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 1992
Docket91-206
StatusPublished

This text of 594 So. 2d 351 (Towner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Towner v. State, 594 So. 2d 351, 1992 WL 41467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

594 So.2d 351 (1992)

John Lee TOWNER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 6, 1992.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robin Compton Jones, Asst. Atty. General, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

GRIFFIN, Judge.

In 1989 appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to charges of accessory after the fact to second degree murder and strong-arm robbery. He was adjudicated guilty of the robbery, but adjudication was withheld on the accessory charge. On the strong-arm robbery charge he was given a true split sentence of fifteen years, consisting of seven years imprisonment with the balance to be served on probation. On the accessory charge adjudication was withheld and appellant was placed on probation for five years consecutive to the sentence for the strong-arm robbery.

After release from incarceration, while appellant was on probation for the robbery, he was charged with burglary. Appellant pled nolo contendere to the burglary charge and admitted the violation of probation. Appellant was sentenced to five years incarceration on the accessory charge and nine years incarceration on the strong-arm robbery charge. On the new burglary, appellant was sentenced to four years.

This appeal concerns only the propriety of these sentences. We find no error except in the nine year sentence on the robbery charge. Having received a true split sentence, the maximum sentence available upon violation of probation was the balance of the probationary period. Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1988).

We vacate the sentence for robbery (Case No. 87-6736) and remand for resentencing; otherwise the judgment and sentences are affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; SENTENCE VACATED in part; REMANDED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poore v. State
531 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Stonebraker v. State
594 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
594 So. 2d 351, 1992 WL 41467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/towner-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.