Stonebraker v. State
This text of 594 So. 2d 351 (Stonebraker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm Stonebraker’s convictions and sentence, including the imposition of a fine and restitution, but we remand for the trial court to strike conditions of probation relating to alcohol use or visiting premises upon which alcohol or intoxicants are sold on the ground that such conditions are unrelated to the crime of grand theft for which Sto-nebraker was convicted. Daniels v. State, 583 So.2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 So. 2d 351, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2397, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stonebraker-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.