Stonebraker v. State
594 So. 2d 351, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2397, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 659
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 1992·No. No. 91-00328·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
We affirm Stonebraker’s convictions and sentence, including the imposition of a fine and restitution, but we remand for the trial court to strike conditions of probation relating to alcohol use or visiting premises upon which alcohol or intoxicants are sold on the ground that such conditions are unrelated to the crime of grand theft for which Sto-nebraker was convicted. Daniels v. State, 583 So.2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stonebraker v. State, 594 So. 2d 351, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2397, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
594 So. 2d 351 (Stonebraker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Gomes
903 N.E.2d 234 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2009)
Biller v. State
618 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Biller v. State
604 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Towner v. State
594 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)