Town of Trumbull v. Wales

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 66, 3 Conn. Supp. 66, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 110
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedOctober 29, 1935
DocketFile #48762
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 66 (Town of Trumbull v. Wales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Trumbull v. Wales, 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 66, 3 Conn. Supp. 66, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 110 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

INGLIS, J.

This is an action to recover taxes assessed on real estate which is now held by the defendants in trust. The demurrer raises the question as to whether the defend' ants may be sued for these taxes personally or whether as claimed by the defendants, they may be sued only in their representative capacity.

The complaint alleges in paragraph 8 that the defendants “are indebted” for these taxes. That allegation must mean that the taxes were assessed while they have been the holders of the legal title to the property. If so assessed they have become a debt due from the persons against whom they were assessed.

*67 Sec. 1231 Gen. St. Rev. 1930.

When a fiduciary incurs a debt in the administration of his trust, such a debt is treated as a debt due from him personally. He is personally bound to pay it, although of course if it is properly chargeable against the trust fund he may charge it back in his accounting.

Cleveland, Probate Law page 184.

The person to whom such a debt is owed may recover either in a suit against the fiduciary personally or in a suit against him, or his successors, in his or their fiduciary capacity.

Sec. 5640, Gen. St. Rev. 1930.

The taxes sought to be recovered in this action constituting a( debt due from the trustees personally against whom they have been assessed, may, therefore, be recovered in an action such as this brought against such trustees personally.

Bangor & Pierce, Admx., 106 Me. 527.

The demurrer is, therefore, overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gelormino v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., No. Cv 96 0067840 (May 22, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5654 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Lamothe v. Reyelt, No. Cv 950069418 (May 21, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 4915 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Tauck Tours, Inc. v. Mitchell Bailey, No. Cv 940142535s (May 6, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5008 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Amati v. Nallainathan, No. Cv 298653s (Sep. 4, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5370-GGGGG (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Amati v. Nallainathan, No. Cv 29 86 53s (Aug. 30, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5253-S (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Continental Casualty v. Dentsply International, No. 124660 (Feb. 15, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 1343 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
H. Grodsky Company v. U.S. Pipe Foundry Co., No. 533533 (Jan. 24, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 969 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)
Pilot's Choice v. E. E. Zimmerman Company, No. 31 60 54 (Mar. 27, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2734 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Kofkoff Feed, Inc. v. Agway, Inc., No. 522748 (Jan. 6, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 143-U (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Davis v. Acme Pest Control, No. Cv92 003 96 12 S (Jan. 25, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 944 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Thivierge v. Fortress Scientific Limited, No. 10 07 90 (Jun. 14, 1993)
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 5809 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1993)
City of Danbury v. Topside Sealers, Inc., No. 30 92 68 (Dec. 30, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 11453 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Conn. Super. Ct. 66, 3 Conn. Supp. 66, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-trumbull-v-wales-connsuperct-1935.