Town of Ramapo v. Webb

137 A.D.2d 518, 524 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 838
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 1, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 137 A.D.2d 518 (Town of Ramapo v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Ramapo v. Webb, 137 A.D.2d 518, 524 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated April 10, 1985, which, after a hearing, approved the establishment of a community residential facility at the location desired by the respondents, rather than at the alternative site proposed by the petitioner.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the facility will cause an overconcentration of similar facilities which would alter the nature and character of the area (see, Matter of Town of Hempstead v Commissioner of State of N. Y. Off. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 121 AD2d 388). Moreover, the Commissioner’s determination to the contrary was supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176; Town of Hempstead v Commissioner, State of N. Y. Off. of [519]*519Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 89 AD2d 850).

We further conclude that the record contains substantial evidence to support the Commissioner’s finding that the alternative site proposed by the petitioner for a community residential facility was not a superior site (see, Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v Webb, 111 AD2d 760). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Southeast v. Maul
225 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re City of Glen Cove
175 A.D.2d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Town of Hempstead v. Commissioner of State of New York Office of Mental Health
170 A.D.2d 1051 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
City of Glen Cove v. Surles
157 A.D.2d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Town of Poughkeepsie v. Webb
157 A.D.2d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Edgemont Neighborhood Community Ass'n v. Surles
155 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Paino v. Webb
152 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Incorporated Village of Freeport v. Webb
147 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Town of Bedford v. State of New York Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
144 A.D.2d 473 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Town of Brookhaven v. Katz
143 A.D.2d 1023 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A.D.2d 518, 524 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-ramapo-v-webb-nyappdiv-1988.