Town of Brookhaven v. Katz

143 A.D.2d 1023, 533 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10832
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 143 A.D.2d 1023 (Town of Brookhaven v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Brookhaven v. Katz, 143 A.D.2d 1023, 533 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Arthur Y. Webb, the Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated October 21, 1986, which, after a hearing, approved the establishment of a community residential facility at the location desired by the respondent H. William Schmitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Maryhaven Center of Hope, rather than at the alternative sites proposed by the petitioner.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the Commissioner’s determination, which rejected its objections to the establishment of a community residential facility at the location selected by the respondent Commissioner Webb, is supported by substantial evidence (see, Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 [c]; Town of Ramapo v Webb, 137 AD2d 518). Moreover, the petitioner failed to proffer any evidence demonstrating that the establishment of the facility will cause an overconcentra[1024]*1024tion of similar facilities, thereby altering the character of the area involved (see, Mental Hygiene Law §41.34 [c]; Town of Ramapo v Webb, supra), or that the alternate sites it proposed were superior to that selected by the respondent Commissioner Webb (see, Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v Webb, 111 AD2d 760).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re City of Glen Cove
175 A.D.2d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
City of Glen Cove v. Surles
157 A.D.2d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Edgemont Neighborhood Community Ass'n v. Surles
155 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 A.D.2d 1023, 533 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-brookhaven-v-katz-nyappdiv-1988.