Town of Genoa v. Woodruff
This text of 92 U.S. 502 (Town of Genoa v. Woodruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Twenty-six errors have been assigned in this case, not one of which can be sustained. All which have the least plausibility have been considered and declared unfounded in Town of Venice v. Murdoch, supra, p. 494; and the others might well be dismissed without special notice. The thirteenth complains that the circuit judge decided that the plaintiffs could recover interest upon the coupons from the time they fell due. That the ruling was correct is perfectly plain. It was in entire accordance with the decisions generally of the State courts and also of this court.
The other assignments have either been answered in Town of Venice v. Murdoch, or they are totally without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 U.S. 502, 23 L. Ed. 586, 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-genoa-v-woodruff-scotus-1876.