Town of Francisco v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Town of Francisco v. Board of Commissioners

102 N.E. 877, 54 Ind. App. 242, 1913 Ind. App. LEXIS 97

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 16, 1913

DocketNo. 8,099

StatusPublished

This text of 102 N.E. 877 (Town of Francisco v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Francisco v. Board of Commissioners, 102 N.E. 877, 54 Ind. App. 242, 1913 Ind. App. LEXIS 97 (Ind. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Shea, J.

[243]*2431. [242]*242This was an action upon a claim filed by appellant, the town of Francisco, against appellee, the Board of Commissioners of Gibson County. Appellee urges that ap[243]*243pellant has not complied with Buie 22 of this court in the preparation of its brief, therefore the appeal should be dismissed. Neither the amended claim, nor the demurrer thereto, nor the substance of either, is set out in appellant’s brief. Under numerous decisions of both this and the Supreme Court, no question is presented. Pry v. Ramage (1911), 176 Ind. 446, 96 N. E. 385; Korporal v. Ramage (1911), 176 Ind. 484, 96 N. E. 385; Leventhal v. Crampton (1911), 48 Ind. App. 92, 95 N. E. 547; Shrader v. Meyer (1911), 48 Ind. App. 36, 38, 95 N. E. 335; Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Bowen (1913), 179 Ind. 142, 100 N. E. 465.

Appeal dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 102 N. E. 877. See, also, 2 Cyc. 1014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shea, J.

[243]*2431. [242]*242This was an action upon a claim filed by appellant, the town of Francisco, against appellee, the Board of Commissioners of Gibson County. Appellee urges that ap[243]*243pellant has not complied with Buie 22 of this court in the preparation of its brief, therefore the appeal should be dismissed. Neither the amended claim, nor the demurrer thereto, nor the substance of either, is set out in appellant’s brief. Under numerous decisions of both this and the Supreme Court, no question is presented. Pry v. Ramage (1911), 176 Ind. 446, 96 N. E. 385; Korporal v. Ramage (1911), 176 Ind. 484, 96 N. E. 385; Leventhal v. Crampton (1911), 48 Ind. App. 92, 95 N. E. 547; Shrader v. Meyer (1911), 48 Ind. App. 36, 38, 95 N. E. 335; Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Bowen (1913), 179 Ind. 142, 100 N. E. 465.

Appeal dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 102 N. E. 877. See, also, 2 Cyc. 1014.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 N.E. 877, 54 Ind. App. 242, 1913 Ind. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-francisco-v-board-of-commissioners-ind-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack