Korporal v. Ramage

96 N.E. 385, 176 Ind. 484, 1911 Ind. LEXIS 151
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 21, 1911
DocketNo. 21,902
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 N.E. 385 (Korporal v. Ramage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Korporal v. Ramage, 96 N.E. 385, 176 Ind. 484, 1911 Ind. LEXIS 151 (Ind. 1911).

Opinion

Jordan, C. J.

This action was instituted in the Grant Superior Court, to recover upon a gas lease. The cause was subsequently venued to the Blackford Circuit Court. The complaint is in three paragraphs. A demurrer to each paragraph was sustained. These rulings of the lower court are the only errors assigned and relied upon in this appeal for reversal. Counsel for appellee urge the same objections to appellants’ brief that were pointed out in the case of Pry v. Ramage (1911), ante, 446, namely, that the paragraphs to which demurrers were sustained were not set out in full nor in substance in the brief, as required by the rules of the Supreme and Appellate Courts. An examination of appellants’ brief fully sustains appellee’s objection.

[485]*485It follows, therefore, that all the errors assigned and relied on for reversal must be deemed and held to be waived, and for this reason the appeal must be dismissed. Pry v. Ramaye, supra.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawkins v. First National Bank
143 N.E. 709 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1924)
Town of Francisco v. Board of Commissioners
102 N.E. 877 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.E. 385, 176 Ind. 484, 1911 Ind. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korporal-v-ramage-ind-1911.