Tower v. Ellsworth
This text of 37 S.E. 736 (Tower v. Ellsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. It is within the discretion of the judge to allow a default to be opened at the trial term, for providential cause preventing the filing of a plea, or for excusable neglect, or where the judge, from all the facts, is of opinion that a proper case for opening the default has been made. Civil Code, § 5072 ; [461]*461Fleetwood v. Equitable Mortgage Co., 108 Ga. 811; Graham v. B. & L. Ass’n, 110 Ga. 278; Mitchell v. Williams, 110 Ga. 280; Mitchell v. Allen, 110 Ga. 282.
2. It follows from the foregoing that this court will not reverse the judgment of a trial judge refusing to open a default, when the only reason assigned for the failure to appear and plead at the proper time is a misunderstanding of counsel for defendant, based on a statement made by the latter, as to the nature of the action.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 S.E. 736, 112 Ga. 460, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tower-v-ellsworth-ga-1900.