Mitchell v. Williams

34 S.E. 848, 110 Ga. 280, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 555
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 1, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 S.E. 848 (Mitchell v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. Williams, 34 S.E. 848, 110 Ga. 280, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 555 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. It was, at the trial term of an action, a wise exercise of discretion to refuse to allow the defendant to open a default, it not appearing that he was by providential cause prevented from filing his defense at the proper time, or that on account of excusable neglect, or for any other good reason, the court should have allowed the default to have been opened on terms. Civil Code, §5072.

2. The present writ of error being palpably without merit, there can be no reasonable conclusion except that it was sued out for delay only, and accordingly damages are awarded in favor of the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tower v. Ellsworth
37 S.E. 736 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 S.E. 848, 110 Ga. 280, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-williams-ga-1899.